Rectangular hyperbolae and the orthocentre

Firstly, a major announcement: Maria Holdcroft (whom you may remember from the cipher solvers page) and I will be performing a charity skydive on the 2nd April! If you wish to sponsor us, please specify the amount you intend to donate by commenting either on the Facebook event page xor at the bottom of this article. All donations will go entirely to the remarkably-efficient Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (which saves approximately one life per £0.50 GBP or $0.83 USD).

Anyway, without further ado, let us begin:

The orthocentre

In an arbitrary triangle ABC, the orthocentre H is the unique intersection point of the three altitudes (lines passing through one vertex and perpendicular to the opposite side). This is unsatisfactory as a definition, since we haven’t yet proved that the point exists. However, it is perfectly valid to define the orthocentre as such:

The orthocentre is the intersection of the altitudes from A and B.

Consequently, it is the unique point H such that AH is perpendicular to BC, and BH is perpendicular to AC.


We wish to prove that CH is perpendicular to AB. There is a rather short proof using synthetic Euclidean geometry, although it’s rather boring. Instead, we can use algebraic projective geometry to prove the following more general statement, and then recover the concurrency of the altitudes as an immediate corollary:

A conic passing through A, B and C is a rectangular hyperbola if and only if it also passes through H.

Note that we adopt the convention that a pair of perpendicular lines is a (degenerate) rectangular hyperbola, so the lines CH and AB are perpendicular if and only if they together constitute a rectangular hyperbola.

Parametrising conics

We shall use projective coordinates, so the point with Cartesian coordinates (x, y) will have projective coordinates (x, y, 1). Moreover, the points (x, y, z) and (λx, λy, λz) are equivalent for all non-zero reals λ. Then, a general conic is an equation of the form:

  • Γ(x, y, z) = Ax² + Bxy + Cy² + Dxz + Eyz + Fz² = 0

where A, B, C, D, E, F are not all zero. A conic is degenerate if it can be factorised into two linear terms, in which case it is the union of the corresponding lines. If A, B and C are all zero, then the equation z = 0 (the line at infinity) is a factor.

We can think of these equations as vectors (A, B, C, D, E, F) in a six-dimensional vector space. Scalar multiples of a given vector all represent the same curve, so the space of conics is actually a five-dimensional projective space. However, it is more convenient to work in the vector space than the projective space since we have extra structure, namely the operations of addition and scalar multiplication.

Observe that for any point P = (x, y, z), the constraint ‘the conic passes through P’ is a linear equation in A, B, C, D, E, F. Hence, the pencil of conics passing through a given point form a five-dimensional vector subspace (or a four-dimensional projective space of curves).

Consequently, the space of conics passing through A, B, C and H is a two-dimensional vector subspace. We would like to show that the space of rectangular hyperbolae passing through A, B and C is also a two-dimensional vector subspace, which would follow from being able to express ‘the conic is a rectangular hyperbola’ as a linear equation in A, B, C, D, E, F.

A rectangular hyperbola is defined to be a hyperbola whose asymptotes are perpendicular. Since we only care about the direction of the asymptotes, we can determine whether a hyperbola is rectangular simply by where it meets the line at infinity z = 0. Consequently, it suffices to throw away any terms containing a z, so we get a simpler ‘asymptotic’ equation of the conic:

Γ(x, y, 0) = Ax² + Bxy + Cy² = 0

If we express this as a product of two lines through the origin, (Px + Qy)(Rx + Sy) = 0, then the perpendicularity of the two lines means that P/Q = -S/R, or PR + QS = 0. Expanding out, this translates to the very simple linear condition A + C = 0. Consequently, rectangular hyperbolae through A, B and C indeed form a two-dimensional vector subspace.

However, we don’t yet know that they form the same two-dimensional vector subspace as the conics passing through A, B, C and H. To prove that, it would be sufficient to find two common ‘basis vectors’ — linearly independent rectangular hyperbolae that pass through A, B, C and H. But this is easy:

  • The pair of lines AH and BC are perpendicular thus constitute a rectangular hyperbola;
  • The pair of lines BH and AC are similarly perpendicular.

They are clearly different conics, so the equations are not scalar multiples of each other and therefore are linearly independent. This completes the proof.

A relevant fact is that the locus of centres of the hyperbolae passing through A, B, C and H is the nine-point circle of ABC. Again, with the machinery in place, this is not too difficult to prove. The centre of the conic is the point such that ∂Γ/∂x = ∂Γ/∂y = 0, so it is the intersection of the lines 2Ax + By + Dz = 0 and Bx + 2Cy + Ez = 0.

Since A + C = 0, it is easy to see that the two aforementioned lines are perpendicular. Also, the linear equations in A, B, C, D, E, F mean that each of the two families of lines (as the hyperbola varies) have a common point. Consequently, we can describe the locus of centres of hyperbolae as the locus of intersections of lines l1 and l2 such that l1 passes through P1, l2 passes through P2, and l1 is perpendicular to l2. We know by Thales’ theorem that this describes a circle.

It is now trivial to see that this must be the nine-point circle, since the three degenerate rectangular hyperbolae have centres given by each of the three altitude feet, and the nine-point circle is the unique circle passing through these three feet.

Interesting examples of such hyperbolae

Recall that five points in general position determine a conic, since they correspond to five linearly independent constraints and thus fix a one-dimensional subspace (which contains a single conic). Hence, if we specify a fifth point in addition to A, B, C and H, we get a unique rectangular hyperbola. This is particularly interesting when the fifth point is a triangle centre. Examples include:

  • Kiepert hyperbola: also passes through the centroid G, the Spieker centre, the Fermat-Torricelli points, inter alia;
  • Jerabek hyperbola: also passes through the circumcentre O and symmedian point K;
  • Feuerbach hyperbola: also passes through the incentre I, Nagel point, Gergonne point and mittenpunkt.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Rectangular hyperbolae and the orthocentre

  1. Pingback: Cipher 62: Also untitled | Complex Projective 4-Space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s